Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t plan to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking cigarettes, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier vapinger.com alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we have to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.